| Tim Windelschmidt | 6d33a43 | 2025-02-04 14:34:25 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | // Copyright The Monogon Project Authors. |
| Lorenz Brun | 56a7ae6 | 2020-10-29 11:03:30 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 2 | // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 |
| Lorenz Brun | 56a7ae6 | 2020-10-29 11:03:30 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 3 | |
| Serge Bazanski | 216fe7b | 2021-05-21 18:36:16 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 4 | // Package dhcp4c provides a client implementation of the DHCPv4 protocol |
| 5 | // (RFC2131) and a few extensions for Linux-based systems. |
| Lorenz Brun | 56a7ae6 | 2020-10-29 11:03:30 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 6 | // The code is split into three main parts: |
| Tim Windelschmidt | 99e1511 | 2025-02-05 17:38:16 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 7 | // - The core DHCP state machine, which lives in dhcpc.go |
| 8 | // - Mechanisms to send and receive DHCP messages, which live in transport/ |
| 9 | // - Standard callbacks which implement necessary kernel configuration steps in |
| 10 | // a simple and standalone way living in callback/ |
| Lorenz Brun | 56a7ae6 | 2020-10-29 11:03:30 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 11 | // |
| Serge Bazanski | 216fe7b | 2021-05-21 18:36:16 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 12 | // Since the DHCP protocol is ugly and underspecified (see |
| 13 | // https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-implementation-02 for a subset of |
| 14 | // known issues), this client slightly bends the specification in the following |
| 15 | // cases: |
| Tim Windelschmidt | 99e1511 | 2025-02-05 17:38:16 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 16 | // - IP fragmentation for DHCP messages is not supported for both sending and |
| 17 | // receiving messages This is because the major servers (ISC, dnsmasq, ...) |
| 18 | // do not implement it and just drop fragmented packets, so it would be |
| 19 | // counterproductive to try to send them. The client just attempts to send |
| 20 | // the full message and hopes it passes through to the server. |
| 21 | // - The suggested timeouts and wait periods have been tightened significantly. |
| 22 | // When the standard was written 10Mbps Ethernet with hubs was a common |
| 23 | // interconnect. Using these would make the client extremely slow on today's |
| 24 | // 1Gbps+ networks. |
| 25 | // - Wrong data in DHCP responses is fixed up if possible. This fixing includes |
| 26 | // dropping prohibited options, clamping semantically invalid data and |
| 27 | // defaulting not set options as far as it's possible. Non-recoverable |
| 28 | // responses (for example because a non-Unicast IP is handed out or lease |
| 29 | // time is not set or zero) are still ignored. All data which can be stored |
| 30 | // in both DHCP fields and options is also normalized to the corresponding |
| 31 | // option. |
| 32 | // - Duplicate Address Detection is not implemented by default. It's slow, hard |
| 33 | // to implement correctly and generally not necessary on modern networks as |
| 34 | // the servers already waste time checking for duplicate addresses. It's |
| 35 | // possible to hook it in via a LeaseCallback if necessary in a given |
| 36 | // application. |
| Lorenz Brun | 56a7ae6 | 2020-10-29 11:03:30 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 37 | // |
| Serge Bazanski | 216fe7b | 2021-05-21 18:36:16 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 38 | // Operationally, there's one known caveat to using this client: If the lease |
| 39 | // offered during the select phase (in a DHCPOFFER) is not the same as the one |
| 40 | // sent in the following DHCPACK the first one might be acceptable, but the |
| 41 | // second one might not be. This can cause pathological behavior where the |
| 42 | // client constantly switches between discovering and requesting states. |
| 43 | // Depending on the reuse policies on the DHCP server this can cause the client |
| 44 | // to consume all available IP addresses. Sadly there's no good way of fixing |
| 45 | // this within the boundaries of the protocol. A DHCPRELEASE for the adresse |
| 46 | // would need to be unicasted so the unaccepable address would need to be |
| 47 | // configured which can be either impossible if it's not valid or not |
| 48 | // acceptable from a security standpoint (for example because it overlaps with |
| 49 | // a prefix used internally) and a DHCPDECLINE would cause the server to |
| 50 | // blacklist the IP thus also depleting the IP pool. |
| 51 | // This could be potentially avoided by originating DHCPRELEASE packages from a |
| 52 | // userspace transport, but said transport would need to be routing- and |
| 53 | // PMTU-aware which would make it even more complicated than the existing |
| Lorenz Brun | 56a7ae6 | 2020-10-29 11:03:30 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 54 | // BroadcastTransport. |
| 55 | package dhcp4c |