Serge Bazanski | 32d7348 | 2021-02-01 23:49:17 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | // Copyright 2020 The Monogon Project Authors. |
| 2 | // |
| 3 | // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 |
| 4 | // |
| 5 | // Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); |
| 6 | // you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. |
| 7 | // You may obtain a copy of the License at |
| 8 | // |
| 9 | // http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 |
| 10 | // |
| 11 | // Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software |
| 12 | // distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, |
| 13 | // WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. |
| 14 | // See the License for the specific language governing permissions and |
| 15 | // limitations under the License. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | syntax = "proto3"; |
| 18 | package metropolis.proto.api; |
| 19 | option go_package = "source.monogon.dev/metropolis/proto/api"; |
| 20 | |
Serge Bazanski | 9ffa1f9 | 2021-09-01 15:42:23 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 21 | import "metropolis/proto/ext/authorization.proto"; |
| 22 | |
Serge Bazanski | 32d7348 | 2021-02-01 23:49:17 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 23 | // Authentication, authorization and accounting. |
| 24 | service AAA { |
| 25 | // Escrow is an endpoint used to retrieve short-lived access credentials to |
| 26 | // the cluster. These short-lived access credentials are x509 certificates |
| 27 | // that can then be used to directly authenticate to other RPC methods |
| 28 | // exposed by Metropolis. This short-lived certificate may or may not be |
| 29 | // fully self-standing cryptographically - this depends on the policy and |
| 30 | // other configuration of the system. The returned short-lived certificate |
| 31 | // may even be used as proofs within next Escrow calls in the case of more |
| 32 | // complex flows. |
| 33 | // |
| 34 | // The client in this RPC is an end-user of the cluster, be it a human or |
| 35 | // automated process that runs outside of a Metropolis cluster. |
| 36 | // |
| 37 | // To retrieve this short-lived certificate, the client must provide |
| 38 | // different kind of proofs to the server. Upon connecting and receiving |
| 39 | // the initial message from the client, the server will send a list of |
| 40 | // proof requests, detailing proofs that the client must need to fulfill to |
| 41 | // retrieve the requested credentials. Which proofs are requested depends |
| 42 | // on the configuration of the client. The way to fulfill these proofs |
| 43 | // depend on their kind, with some being provided in-band (eg. access |
| 44 | // credentials, U2F codes), some being provided out of band (eg. an RPC |
| 45 | // channel opened from a given IP address or with a given existing TLS |
| 46 | // certificate), and some dependent on external systems (eg. SSO). |
| 47 | // |
| 48 | // If the requested identity within the first EscrowFromClient is not |
| 49 | // defined, the server may: |
| 50 | // |
| 51 | // - Abort the connection immediately with an error about an unknown |
| 52 | // identity being requested. |
| 53 | // - Continue processing the Escrow RPC as if the identity existed, and |
| 54 | // either gather enough other proofs to be able to trust the client |
| 55 | // enough to abort it saying that the identity is unknown; or continue |
| 56 | // and pretend that the other proofs submitted by the client are |
| 57 | // invalid. |
| 58 | // |
| 59 | // Once the proofs are fulfilled by the client, the server will send an |
| 60 | // x509 PEM-encoded certificate that the client can use in subsequent |
| 61 | // calls to other Metropolis services. |
| 62 | // |
| 63 | // TODO(q3k): SPIFFE compatibility for short-lived certificates? |
| 64 | // |
| 65 | // This escrow flow can thus be used to implement several typical flows |
| 66 | // used for 'logging in' cluster users: |
| 67 | // |
| 68 | // Example: Username and password login |
| 69 | // |
| 70 | // This shows the simplest possible message flow for a simple interactive |
| 71 | // password authentication. |
| 72 | // |
| 73 | // Client Server |
| 74 | // | | |
| 75 | // | .---------------------------. | |
| 76 | // |----------| parameters < |-------->>>| |
| 77 | // | | requested_identity_name: | | |
| 78 | // | | "janedoe" | | |
| 79 | // | | public_key: | | |
| 80 | // | | "DEADBEEF..." | | |
| 81 | // | | > | | |
| 82 | // | '---------------------------' | |
| 83 | // | | |
| 84 | // | .---------------------------. | |
| 85 | // |<<<-------| needed < |-----------| |
| 86 | // | | kind: PLAINTEXT_PASSWORD | | |
| 87 | // | | > | | |
| 88 | // | '---------------------------' | |
| 89 | // | | |
| 90 | // | .---------------------------. | |
| 91 | // |----------| proofs < |-------->>>| |
| 92 | // | | plaintext_password: ".." | | |
| 93 | // | | > | | |
| 94 | // | '---------------------------' | |
| 95 | // | | |
| 96 | // | .---------------------------. | |
| 97 | // |<<<-------| fulfilled < |-----------| |
| 98 | // | | kind: PLAINTEXT_PASSWORD | | |
| 99 | // | | > | | |
| 100 | // | | emitted_certificate: | | |
| 101 | // | | "DEADFOOD..." | | |
| 102 | // | '---------------------------' | |
| 103 | // | | |
| 104 | // |<<<---------------- close ----------------------- | |
| 105 | // | | |
| 106 | // |
| 107 | // Example: multi-phase OIDC with hardware assessment (simplified): |
| 108 | // |
| 109 | // This first requests a certificate that's valid for one day, and requires |
| 110 | // the interactive use of a browser. Then, shorter-term certificates |
| 111 | // (actually used to perform RPCs) are requested on demand, their lifetime |
| 112 | // corresponding to the access tokens emitted by the IdP, but requiring |
| 113 | // no interactive browser access or reconfirmations by the user. |
| 114 | // |
| 115 | // Client Server |
| 116 | // | | |
| 117 | // | .--------------------------------------. | |
| 118 | // |<<<--| Exchange OIDC login proof and TPM |-->>>| |
| 119 | // | | assessment for week-long certificate,| |<--> IdP |
| 120 | // | | retrieve 1-day long certificate | |<--> User |
| 121 | // | | binding user to a refresh token on | | Browser |
| 122 | // | | the server. | | |
| 123 | // | '--------------------------------------' | |
| 124 | // | | |
| 125 | // | .--------------------------------------. | -. |
| 126 | // |<<<--| Exchange earlier certificate and TPM |-->>>|<--> IdP |
| 127 | // | | hardware assessment for 10-minute | | | |
| 128 | // | | long self-standing cryptographic | | > Repeats as |
| 129 | // | | certificate used to access other | | | long as |
| 130 | // | | services | | \ possible. |
| 131 | // | '--------------------------------------' | -' |
| 132 | // |
| 133 | // FAQ: How does this relate to access via web browsers? |
| 134 | // |
| 135 | // This flow is explicitly designed to be non dependent on web browers for |
| 136 | // security reasons. Due to these requirements, we cannot port this flow to |
| 137 | // always also work on browsers. Instead, we focus on the best that a |
| 138 | // standalone application on the client side can give us, eg. being able to |
| 139 | // use TLS client certificates, perform hardware attestation, and even talk |
| 140 | // to HSMs. |
| 141 | // |
| 142 | // In addition to this gRPC Escrow flow, an alternative flow geared |
| 143 | // especially towards web browser access (and eg. bearer token |
| 144 | // authentication and OAuth/OpenIDC integration) will be developed for |
| 145 | // users whose cluster policy allows for browser access. Both, however, |
| 146 | // will lead to retrieving identities from with the same namespace of |
| 147 | // entities. |
| 148 | // |
Serge Bazanski | 9ffa1f9 | 2021-09-01 15:42:23 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 149 | rpc Escrow(stream EscrowFromClient) returns (stream EscrowFromServer) { |
| 150 | option (metropolis.proto.ext.authorization) = { |
| 151 | // The AAA implementation performs its own checks as needed, so the |
| 152 | // RPC middleware should allow everything through. |
| 153 | allow_unauthenticated: true |
| 154 | }; |
| 155 | } |
Serge Bazanski | 32d7348 | 2021-02-01 23:49:17 +0100 | [diff] [blame] | 156 | } |
| 157 | |
| 158 | message EscrowFromClient { |
| 159 | // Parameters used for the entirety of the escrow flow. These must be set |
| 160 | // only during the first EscrowFromClient message, and are ignored in |
| 161 | // further messages. |
| 162 | message Parameters { |
| 163 | // The requested identity name. This is currently opaque and not defined, |
| 164 | // but corresponds to the future 'Entity' system that Metropolis will |
| 165 | // implement. Required. |
| 166 | string requested_identity_name = 1; |
| 167 | |
| 168 | // Public key for which the short-lived certificate will be issued. |
| 169 | // Currently, this must be an ed25519 public key's raw bytes (32 |
| 170 | // bytes). In the future, other x509 signature algorithms might be |
| 171 | // supported. |
| 172 | // This key does not have to be the same key as the one that is part of |
| 173 | // the presented certificate during the Escrow RPC (if any). However, |
| 174 | // some proofs might have stricter requirements. |
| 175 | bytes public_key = 2; |
| 176 | } |
| 177 | Parameters parameters = 1; |
| 178 | |
| 179 | // Proofs. These should only be submitted by the client after the server |
| 180 | // requests them, but if they are submitted within the first |
| 181 | // EscrowFromClientMessage they will be interpreted too. The problem with |
| 182 | // ahead of time proofs is that different a proof request from the server |
| 183 | // might parametrize the request in a way that would elicit a different |
| 184 | // answer from the client, so care must be taken to ensure that the |
| 185 | // requests from the server are verified against the assumption that the |
| 186 | // client makes (if any). Ideally, the client should be fully reactive to |
| 187 | // requested proofs, and not hardcode any behaviour. |
| 188 | message Proofs { |
| 189 | // Plaintext password in response to KIND_PLAINTEXT_PASSWORD proof |
| 190 | // request. |
| 191 | string plaintext_password = 1; |
| 192 | } |
| 193 | Proofs proofs = 2; |
| 194 | } |
| 195 | |
| 196 | message EscrowFromServer { |
| 197 | // A proof requested from the server. Within an Escrow RPC, proofs can be |
| 198 | // either 'needed' or 'fulfilled'. Each proof has a kind, and kinds within |
| 199 | // all proof requests (either needed or fulfilled) are unique. |
| 200 | message ProofRequest { |
| 201 | enum Kind { |
| 202 | KIND_INVALID = 0; |
| 203 | // The client needs to present a long-lived 'refresh' certificate. |
| 204 | // If this is in `needed`, it means the client did not present a |
| 205 | // certificate and will need to abort this RPC and connect with one |
| 206 | // presented. |
| 207 | // If the client presents an invalid certificate, the Escrow RPC |
| 208 | // will fail. |
| 209 | KIND_REFRESH_CERTIFICATE = 1; |
| 210 | // The client needs to present a static, plaintext password/token. |
| 211 | // This can be fulfilled by setting |
| 212 | // EscrowFromClient.proofs.plaintext_password. |
| 213 | // If the client presents an invalid password, the Escrow RPC will |
| 214 | // fail. |
| 215 | KIND_PLAINTEXT_PASSWORD = 2; |
| 216 | |
| 217 | // Future possibilities: |
| 218 | // // One-or-two-sided hardware assessment via TPM. |
| 219 | // KIND_HARDWARE_ASSESMENT_EXCHANGE = ... |
| 220 | // // Making the client proove that the certificate is stored on |
| 221 | // // some secure element. |
| 222 | // KIND_PRIVATE_KEY_IN_SECURE_ELEMENT = ... |
| 223 | // // Making the client go through an OIDC login flow, with the |
| 224 | // // server possibly storing the resulting refresh/access tokens. |
| 225 | // KIND_OIDC_FLOW_COMPLETION = ... |
| 226 | }; |
| 227 | Kind kind = 1; |
| 228 | } |
| 229 | // Proofs that the server requests from the client which the client has not |
| 230 | // yet fulfilled. Within the lifecycle of the Escrow RPC, the needed proofs |
| 231 | // will only move from needed to fulfilled as the client submits more |
| 232 | // proofs. |
| 233 | repeated ProofRequest needed = 1; |
| 234 | // Proofs that the server accepted from the client. |
| 235 | repeated ProofRequest fulfilled = 2; |
| 236 | |
| 237 | // If all proof requests are fulfilled, the bytes of the emitted PEM |
| 238 | // certificate. |
| 239 | bytes emitted_certificate = 3; |
| 240 | } |
| 241 | |
| 242 | // Protobuf-encoded data that is part of certificates emitted by the |
| 243 | // Metropolis CA. Encoded as protobuf and inserted into a Subject Alternative |
| 244 | // Name of type otherName with type-id: |
| 245 | // |
| 246 | // 2.25.205720787499610521842135044124912906832.1.1 |
| 247 | // |
| 248 | // TODO(q3k): register something under 1.3.6.1.4.1 and alloacte some OID within |
| 249 | // that instead of relying on UUIDs within 2.25? |
| 250 | message CertificateSAN { |
| 251 | // Validity descrises how consumers of this certificate should treat the |
| 252 | // information contained within it. Currently there's two kinds of |
| 253 | // validities, the difference between them being whether or not the |
| 254 | // certificate needs to actively be checked for revocation or not. |
| 255 | enum Validity { |
| 256 | VALIDITY_INVALID = 0; |
| 257 | // Certificate must only be used by components that can verify with |
| 258 | // Metropolis that it hasn't been revoked. The method (OCSP, CRL) |
| 259 | // intentionally left blank for now. |
| 260 | VALIDITY_ONLINE = 1; |
| 261 | // Certificate can be trusted on cryptographic basis alone as long as |
| 262 | // it hasn't expired, without consulting revocation system. |
| 263 | VALIDITY_OFFLINE = 2; |
| 264 | } |
| 265 | Validity validity = 1; |
| 266 | |
| 267 | // Assertions are facts stated about the bearer of this certificate by the |
| 268 | // CA that emitted it - in this case, the Metropolis cluster that emitted |
| 269 | // it. Each assertion details exactly one fact of one kind, and there can |
| 270 | // be multiple assertions of any given kind. |
| 271 | message Assertion { |
| 272 | // IdentityConfirmed asserts that the emitter of this certificate has |
| 273 | // received all the required proofs at the time of issuance to confirm |
| 274 | // that the bearer of this certificate is the entity described by the |
| 275 | // identity name. |
| 276 | message IdentityConfirmed { |
| 277 | string name = 1; |
| 278 | }; |
| 279 | // MetropolisRPCAllowed means that that connections established to |
| 280 | // Metropolis RPC endpoints will proceed. If given, IdentityConfirmed |
| 281 | // must also be given. |
| 282 | message MetropolisRPCAllowed { |
| 283 | // Future possibilities: scoping to only some (low privilege) RPC |
| 284 | // methods, ... |
| 285 | }; |
| 286 | oneof kind { |
| 287 | IdentityConfirmed identity_confirmed = 1; |
| 288 | MetropolisRPCAllowed metropolis_rpc_allowed = 2; |
| 289 | // Future possibilties: |
| 290 | // OIDCIdentityConfirmed ... |
| 291 | // TPMColocationConfirmed ... |
| 292 | // SourceAddressConfirmed ... |
| 293 | // ReportedClientConfiguration ... |
| 294 | }; |
| 295 | } |
| 296 | repeated Assertion assertions = 2; |
| 297 | } |